Positivism and Constructivism : Two opposite but Reconcilable Paradigms In
نویسنده
چکیده
Cross-cultural research is marked by adopting one of two dominant epistemological paradigms: positivism or constructivism. By discussing strengths/weaknesses inherent in each paradigm, this paper argues that rather than contradictory and incommensurable; positivism and constructivism can be considered complementary epistemological orientations which correspond to two conceptual levels of culture. Therefore, it is proposed that rapprochement of two approaches is useful in acquiring a more profound understanding of cultural phenomena in the area of organizational research. Introduction Over the last decades organizational sciences have witnessed an increasing interest in crosscultural studies. In the same way, the need for more robust cultural research has motivated many scholars to scrutinize and develop methodological techniques (Bhagat and McQuaid, 1982; Sekaran, 1983; Nasif et al. 1991; Tayeb 1994, 2001; Cavusgil and Das, 1997). However, the epistemological issues underlying cross-cultural research have not received enough attention. It is recognized that epistemological orientations determine methodological approaches; therefore, discussing epistemology can provide us with better understanding of created knowledge, its sources and its limitations. Moreover, awareness of epistemological issues can be useful in analyzing research drawbacks. Difficulties encountered in cross-cultural research are various in nature and they may transcend methodological boundaries. While some of these problems are identified solely as methodological issues, some others may be considered as problems related to epistemological positions. By recognizing the importance of epistemology and its effects on research process, this paper aims to discuss two major epistemological paradigms and their strengths/weaknesses in investigating a complex concept such as culture. By analyzing their particularities, it is argued that rather than contradictory and incommensurable, positivism and constructivism can be considered as complementary orientations which correspond to two conceptual levels of culture. Therefore, rapprochement and combination of these orientations can be useful in acquiring a more profound understanding of cultural phenomena in the area of organizational science. Epistemological Positions
منابع مشابه
Paradigms and theories in water governance: the case of South Africa’s National Water Resource Strategy, Second Edition
This paper indicates the influence of paradigms and theories on the development of South Africa’s National Water Resource Strategy, Second Edition. Five paradigms exist: positivism, postpositivism, interpretivism/constructivism, critical theories and the participatory paradigm. I use the PULSE3 framework for analysis that I developed to analyse the NWRS2. I found that positivism is the dominant...
متن کاملTargeting the Social: A Sociopragmatic Approach Towards Design and Use of Information Systems
Information Systems Research is being attributed of having no substantial philosophical foundation. A review of contemporary literature reveals not only positivism as the dominating paradigm of human inquiry, but also an increasing criticism and the rise of alternative paradigms. Referring to postmodern organization theory allows a different perspective on IS research, which is based on an epis...
متن کاملتئوری پیچیدگی و رویکرد کلاژیسم در سیستم های ژئومورفیک
Complexity Theory and Collagist Approach in Geomorphic Systems Introduction Now, scientists know the world as complex systems that predict consequences of it is so difficult. In this situation, the systems operated by rotation manner in which chaos is order and discipline leads to chaos. Nowadays, simple idea of how the world work change and convert to complex and paradoxical idea. This i...
متن کاملComparative survey between quantitative and qualitative paradigms (part II)
As stated in the first part of article, we have stated the four major philosophical paradigms ‎which make up the basis for knowledge(epistemology), the nature and reality(ontology) and ‎the acquisition methods of knowledge(methodology). Thus, according to each paradigm, ‎approach to knowledge is determined. ‎‏ ‏ In a more general category, we have two quantitative and qu...
متن کاملPolitics and Paradigm Preferences: The Implicit Ideology of International Relations Scholars1
Are international relations scholars objective observers of political events, or do our political preferences influence the way in which we see the world? This article explores that question using data from a survey of international relations scholars. It develops and tests hypotheses about how we might expect adherents of particular paradigms to identify themselves politically on a left-right ...
متن کامل